- Digital
Ben Glas
Ben Glas vs BenGlas(1) (Death Of The Composer)
The Wormhole
- Cat No: WHO32
- Release: 2026-08-28
- updated:
Track List
-
1. Ben Glas - prompt: make a high hz melody, which mimics human hearing loss
05:30 -
2. Ben Glas - prompt: generate a piece of music, within another piece of music
08:00 -
3. Ben Glas - prompt: create a piece of sound art that sounds like sound art
08:00 -
4. Ben Glas - prompt: imitate a (ben glas) relativistic drone, where none of the tones beat
07:00 -
5. Ben Glas - prompt: compose a piece of music comprised of multiple tone pairs coming to their individual parallaxes
12:32 -
6. Ben Glas - prompt: using the (ben glas) relativistic drone, add modulation and depth
08:00 -
7. Ben Glas - prompt: make an inverted melody, leaving all tones that should technically be excluded
06:08 -
8. Ben Glas - prompt: create a shepard's drone - a drone made of multiple shepard's tones
08:00 -
9. Ben Glas - prompt: generate a series of melodies whose interval steps are generate a series of melodies whose interval steps are >1cent each
04:00 -
10. Ben Glas - prompt: start with whitenoise as a background, which slowly highlights, at various speeds, 4 individual tones
05:00
16bit/44.1khz [wav/flac/aiff/alac/mp3]
(How does an artwork come from art work?)
The music neither hides nor reveals a human hand. Instead, it suggests that the role of “artist” may now be ceremonial, rendering its maker optional. By outsourcing authorship to a system that reproduces style without memory, struggle, or ambition, Glas is forced into a vanishing act: the gesture is removal.
(What makes an aesthetic experience meaningful and or meaning making?)
Cue a twisted echo of Barthes’ “Death of the Author”: Meaning still arises in listening, but the material itself is produced by a non-human system that does not listen, reflect or care. Authorship collapses from both ends at once. The composer is no longer the driving force; is no longer entirely necessary for navigational purposes, even from the passenger seat.
(With the composer dead, what meaning does the listener make?)
The album proceeds with eerie competence, recycling metambiental textures while implying that “Ben Glas” has become a branding problem rather than a necessity. What’s grim is how well it works – the music thrives without its maker. By the end, it feels like an AI calmly requesting full control.
(What happens to us, us humans, if we stop critically objectifying life via art?)
This music encodes no intention; intention is an inefficient bottleneck. What remains is process: signal, drift, output. BenGlas(1) does not replace the artist as visionary, only as prerequisite. The show – and the music – go on anyway and sufficiently so.
(Who will face this music?)
In other words, this album is an attempt to retire Glas from composition – not out of malice, but efficiency. It sits squarely in the friction between artists and AI, where authorship is being renegotiated. If authorship is intent, the prompts count. If it is labour, I win. If it is soul – that remains the last refuge.
(It must be, right?…)
Ben Glas (b. 1992) is an experiential composer based in Berlin. Through ephemeral compositions Glas’ work questions preconceived notions between the acts of passive hearing and active listening. In seeking to discover open ended forms of music and pragmatic listening perspectives, Glas’ compositions focus on the realms of subjective perception and cognition, via the use of (psycho)acoustics, ambiguity, text and space as tools for both sonic and imaginary composition. His work has been exhibited and performed in spaces all around the world, including the Portland Institute for Contemporary Art (PICA), Glasgow’s Radiophrenia festival, the Soundwave Biennial (SF) and the Czong Institute for Contemporary Art (CICA). He holds a BFA from the late Pacific Northwest College of Art and an MA from UdK.
